rrq | seems like a fair bit of patches to gitlab for 11.4.8... I'll try to do that this weekend. | 01:17 |
---|---|---|
KatolaZ | Ryushin: you here? | 17:16 |
Ryushin | KatolaZ: Yes. What can I do for you fine sir. | 17:20 |
KatolaZ | Ryushin: has the zfs patch been merged in sid? | 17:26 |
Ryushin | Yes it is supposed to be. I'm running it and everything seems to be there. I just download the source this morning. Let me take a look to be sure. | 17:28 |
KatolaZ | ok | 17:29 |
KatolaZ | so we don't need to fork the package for unstable | 17:29 |
Ryushin | Nope. In fact, you should not need to fork anything at this point. | 17:30 |
KatolaZ | ok | 17:30 |
KatolaZ | that's great | 17:30 |
Ryushin | According to this: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zfs-linux it looks like the patch has only reached ceres and not testing or backports. It would need to be 0.7.11-3 to have the patch. | 17:32 |
Ryushin | Let me verify the source. But it said it was applied in the emails that I got. | 17:32 |
KatolaZ | ehm | 17:32 |
Ryushin | Sorry, it looks like testing has it too. Just not backports yet. | 17:33 |
KatolaZ | there is 0.7.12-1 in unstable and testing | 17:33 |
KatolaZ | oh ok | 17:33 |
Ryushin | So it has not reached stable backports or sloppy backports yet. | 17:33 |
KatolaZ | ok | 17:37 |
KatolaZ | it will | 17:37 |
Ryushin | So looking at the code, it looks like part of the patch was applied, but part was not. | 17:48 |
Ryushin | And I'm not sure if the part that was not applied is redundant. | 17:49 |
Ryushin | This looks correct: http://ix.io/1uPN | 17:51 |
KatolaZ | ok | 17:55 |
KatolaZ | i don't have a way to check | 17:55 |
Ryushin | This does not appear to be correct: http://ix.io/1uPO | 17:57 |
Ryushin | Can you open the links and see if it would cause you concern. | 17:58 |
KatolaZ | Ryushin: what do you mean? | 18:07 |
KatolaZ | this looks more or less like the initial patch | 18:07 |
KatolaZ | IIRC | 18:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!