| golinux | I'm not sure what your trying to find. That does does not exist in the source tree. There is download/media Maybe you're looking for https://devuan.org/getdevuan ? | 00:13 |
|---|---|---|
| rrq | https://devuan.org/get-devuan | 00:14 |
| golinux | Duh . . thank you! | 00:15 |
| gnu_srs | golinux: The link https://devuan.org/os/download existed yesterday evening when clicking on download at the end of the page of https://devuan.org/os/; | 10:22 |
| gnu_srs | Today it is linked correctly to: https://devuan.org/get-devuan | 10:22 |
| golinux | gnu_srs: Thanks for letting me know where you found the incorrect link. rrq put a redirect on https://devuan.org/os/ to https://devuan.org/get-devuan but I will also change in that partial fragment of code. | 17:08 |
| golinux | The Devuan website could use a massive overhaul as it is not maintainer-friendly. It has proven to be an obstacle to more than one volunteer. I don't understand every part of it but have learned to work with it over the years. | 17:12 |
| gnu_srs | Have yo decided what to do with eudev and udev for Beowulf? That answer is resolving a lot of questions about my future engagement involvement in Devuan! | 22:23 |
| gnu_srs | No eudev or udev packages have migrated to Buowulf even after 5 days, see https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/britney/excuses.html | 22:24 |
| Evilham | gnu_srs: the proposal is to release as it is and publsh your version directly as backport for beowulf and in a very early point release | 22:39 |
| Evilham | Is that problematic? The idea was: it avoids potentially breaking things in subtle ways, makes the new version quickly available, buys time for testing, there is a clear path to have it be the default version | 22:40 |
| gnu_srs | Evilham: Yes, that is problematic for me. I don't want to take responsibility for 3.2.7-6, that version I did not did contribute to at all. | 22:45 |
| gnu_srs | Ask katolaz and CenturionDan for support of that package :( | 22:45 |
| gnu_srs | And again: All (I think so) bugs on eudev are against 3.2.2-13, i.e. the ASCII version. However, ascii-proposed has 3.2.2-17. How come this version has not been released, even with the point release of ASCII? | 22:48 |
| Evilham | It was probably overlooked | 22:54 |
| Evilham | Which wouldnt happen with a beowulf point release if you are around to make sure <3 | 22:54 |
| Evilham | Just further question: what do you mean "take responsibility for 3.2.7-6"? | 22:55 |
| Evilham | I mean, the way I understand it: if you help produce versiin X and you want to help supporting it, thats totally different from version Y<X being the default for a short time | 22:56 |
| Evilham | (I am asking this, mostly to help you make your case more understood, so the better outcome for everyone happens, as I am sure you are aware, everything is a bunch of trade-offs | 22:57 |
| Evilham | And right now, it looks like "we know whats broken with version Y and havent been able to test version X which should be better, but may introduce other issues" is a "winning" tradeoff) | 22:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!