| malade_mental | gordonDrogon: thanks for the rage :) | 15:31 |
|---|---|---|
| Kitty | I asked yesterday about gpg being part of the base install | 17:41 |
| Kitty | I just did a minimal install | 17:41 |
| Kitty | and gpgv is installed | 17:41 |
| Kitty | libgpg-error0 is installed | 17:42 |
| Kitty | no other hits for gpg | 17:42 |
| GyrosGeier | the package is "gnupg", AFAIK | 17:42 |
| Kitty | yes, also not installed | 17:43 |
| GyrosGeier | that shouldn't be in the base install though | 17:43 |
| Kitty | yet apt uses gpg for verifying packages. | 17:43 |
| djph | ... well, apt's _minimum_ requirement is 'gpgv' | 17:44 |
| djph | which is, as I recall, only capable of verifying signatures | 17:45 |
| Kitty | yeah, I am realising that now | 17:45 |
| Kitty | rewrote my automation scripts to avoid it | 17:58 |
| djph | to avoid sig verification? | 18:02 |
| djph | um... | 18:02 |
| Kitty | no. I was using gpg --dearmor | to import a key from text | 18:10 |
| Kitty | instead I've gone for base64 | 18:10 |
| Kitty | I have a script I can wget, that sets up my internal repo. | 18:10 |
| Kitty | then I can start installing packages | 18:10 |
| rwp | I think it might be possible (though I think undesirable) to use --allow-unauthenticated and avoid the need for gpgv to be installed. Maybe. I didn't try it. | 19:18 |
| sabas3dgh | hello all | 19:57 |
| sabas3dgh | hello fsmithred ; | 19:57 |
| fsmithred | hi | 19:58 |
| sabas3dgh | Do you know how could I make a basic project in wxwidget | 19:59 |
| sabas3dgh | ? | 19:59 |
| sabas3dgh | #include "wx-3.0/wx/wx.h | 19:59 |
| sabas3dgh | caused fatal error: wx/defs.h: No such file or directory | 20:00 |
| sabas3dgh | which is obviously at wx-3.0/wx/def.h | 20:00 |
| GyrosGeier | gcc `wx-config --cflags` ... | 20:03 |
| bb|hcb | ... and #include "wx/wx.h" instead (I suppose wx-config sets -I/usr/include/wx-3.0) | 20:06 |
| sabas3dgh | Guys You are right. But how could I tell this to codelite or clion? | 20:07 |
| bb|hcb | they provide wx3.0-examples (apt install wx3.0-examples), maybe starting from there would be much easier | 20:07 |
| sabas3dgh | sets -I/usr/include/wx-3.0 ++++> this part | 20:07 |
| sabas3dgh | and the answer of the wx-config command is : | 20:09 |
| sabas3dgh | wx-config --cflags | 20:09 |
| sabas3dgh | -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/wx/include/gtk3-unicode-3.0 -I/usr/include/wx-3.0 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DWXUSINGDLL -D__WXGTK__ -pthread | 20:09 |
| bb|hcb | All IDEs should have some project config and the possibility to add CFLAGS there. I am deeply unaware about codelite/clion | 20:10 |
| sabas3dgh | bb|hcb, no problem. what you suggest | 20:11 |
| sabas3dgh | I use that one | 20:11 |
| bb|hcb | I am sorry - can not suggest :( I am using vim and makefiles but that is way too far from an IDE | 20:14 |
| sabas3dgh | bb|hcb, I have CMakeLists.txt here | 20:16 |
| sabas3dgh | is that the place? | 20:16 |
| bb|hcb | In the case of codelite, there are project settings (right click on the project folder), then Compiler -> C++ and C compiler options, there it supports adding `wx-config --cflags` ;) | 20:25 |
| tk | I'd like the stability of debian with the simplicity of runit, has devuan's runit support improved? How does it compare to void? | 20:37 |
| rwp | tk, Void is native runit so I presume its runit support is full. Devuan is based on Debian and so runit will be using many (most?) sysvinit scripts in compatibility mode. | 21:09 |
| rwp | That's not necessarily a bad thing though. Everything works very well that way. | 21:10 |
| rwp | And as more people become motivated to add native runit files to packages then it becomes better supported. | 21:10 |
| fsmithred | tk, there's a runit live iso here: https://get.refracta.org/files/experimental/ | 21:23 |
| fsmithred | by default, only the gettys are under runit, but there are a couple of sources of run scripts, and I've implemented some of them in that iso. | 21:23 |
| fsmithred | you get to play with the others | 21:24 |
| tk | I was less concerned about the run scripts (which are trivial to write and replace) and more concerned about how it handled bootup (the 1 script) and shutdown (the 3 script) | 21:43 |
| tk | hmm | 21:44 |
| fsmithred | it works fine | 21:46 |
| fsmithred | here's a discussion that includes posts from runit maintainer: https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=3716 | 21:47 |
| fsmithred | might answer some of your questions | 21:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!