libera/#devuan/ Thursday, 2023-09-28

nn_I just had a apt-get update fail due to a claimed bad signature on Releases.  Anybody else seeing this?05:44
gnarfaceis your clock accurate, and how long has it been since you updated?05:45
gnarfacenn_: ^05:45
nn_The box has been sitting for a couple of days, I'll find out.  Installing on multiple boxen.05:46
onefangAlso you might have caught a package mirror while it was updating.  I got plans to deal with that.05:47
gnarfacenn_: you're not using "stable" or "testing" or "unstable" literally in your sources.list right?05:47
nn_I dont believe so.  I'm booting the box right now, just so I am working from a known state.05:48
gnarfacecheck the system time first05:48
rwpnn_, Are you using apt-cacher-ng as a proxy anywhere?05:49
nn_I compared it to the box I am on now and there was no apparent difference.  I am assuming that if the clocks are within a couple seconds it will not matter?05:49
gnarfacenn_: yea, within 5 minutes should be fine05:50
gnarfacemore than that and DNS will even fail though, these days05:50
rwpI won't say I _routinely_ see the problem with apt-cacher-ng but when I do see it the problem persists until I either clear the cache or avoid the cache.05:50
nn_Hope you stored the IP address for your time server.05:51
gnarfacenn_: my time server is here on my LAN, and so is my DNS, and i would strongly recommend anyone do the same if they care about security05:51
nn_Get:1 file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build InRelease05:52
nn_Ign:1 file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build InRelease05:52
nn_Get:2 file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build Release [1,530 B]05:52
nn_Get:2 file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build Release [1,530 B]05:52
nn_Get:3 file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build Release.gpg05:52
nn_Ign:3 file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build Release.gpg05:52
gnarfacesigh05:52
gnarfacewell, hope they come back05:52
gnarfaceprobably should have warned them about flooding05:52
rwpYup!  But I guess that is the only way people learn not to do that.05:52
gnarfacethe problem is sometimes they get the lesson wrong and just never come back05:53
gnarfacehmm, something weird about the start of that paste though, is it using /var/cache as the repo?05:54
gnarfacethose would be hostnames there if the sources.list was right05:54
gnarfacewouldn't they?05:54
rwpHmm...  That is an interesting observation.  I had missed that.05:55
rwpWhat produces a /var/cache/apt-build/repository path?05:55
onefangCorrect, they should be URLs when Get:ting from a mirror.05:56
gnarfacelooks like maybe someone got clever by putting a file:// url in the sources.list then forgot about it?05:57
rwpYes. But it is also an "apt-build" like this is a local re-build?05:58
gnarfaceoh, i missed that part05:58
onefangSoooo what is this "apt-build"?05:59
gnarfaceyea that seems strange too05:59
gnarfacenow i really want to know what this poor sod was up to but i feel like we may never know05:59
onefang"This is an apt-get front-end for compiling software optimized05:59
onefangfor your architecture by creating a local repository with built packages.05:59
onefangIt can manage system upgrades too."05:59
rwphttps://packages.debian.org/bullseye/apt-build05:59
gnarfaceinteresting05:59
gnarfacegentoo-ify your debian? sound fun!06:00
onefangMight have been that which was failing, so digging deeper might be needed.06:00
gnarfacewell, if they ever make it back, here, someone make sure to mention that to them second (after first mentioning the thing about don't flood or the bot will kick you)06:01
onefangOur new spam bot was eager to prove itself.06:02
rwpIt's a Libera.Chat global bot though so we can safely claim it wasn't *us* that did it. :-}06:02
rwpThey haven't made it back by now they must think they were blocked instead of just killed.  Bummer.06:03
onefangMeanwhile, if I suddenly disappear and don't come back for a while, blame the thunderstorm.  It's not high enough to be in the ozone layer.06:05
rwpMeanwhile in other problems...  Mine in this case.06:05
rwpI installed Daedalus fresh on a new machine.  Installed firefox-esr.  And it does not render the Reddit site correctly!06:05
rwpI installed the upstream Mozilla firefox and it works just fine.  All good.06:05
rwpI conclude that something is wrong with firefox-esr that it does not render reddit.com correctly.06:05
onefangWhat are the version numbers?06:05
brocashelmweird. old.reddit.com works for me, even on pale moon06:05
onefangOr is this firefox vs firefox-esr?06:06
brocashelmreddit's design is pretty anti-design, though06:06
rwpDaedalus firefox-esr 102.15.1esr-1~deb12u1. Versus upstream Mozilla firefox 118.0.06:06
onefangWhen I have to use reddit, I use the old version to avoid the horrid spread of "click here for more, and click here for even more, and this one two, and ..."06:06
brocashelmyou can also try teddit.net06:07
rwpThe incorrect rendering has oversized boxes for the articles and if there is an image then the image is blank.06:07
onefangAny browser extensions?06:07
brocashelmthere's a url rewriter plugin that you can use to automatically parse all reddit.com to old.reddit.com06:07
rwpI always load up uBlock Origin as a security module.06:07
brocashelmhttps://einaregilsson.com/redirector/06:07
brocashelmtry this, rwp06:07
onefangI use uBlock Origin to, but tend to avoid reddit, and I'm not on Daedalus yet.06:08
rwpThat redirector module is an interesting one.  But not sure how it would be configured in this case.06:09
rwpAlso I guess I don't mind using the upstream Mozilla Firefox.  But it would be nice if the Stable repository version also worked.06:09
onefang102.15.1esr here in Chtimaera.06:09
onefanghttps://www.reddit.com/  looks fine here.  I guess.06:10
onefangDoesn't look any different with uBlock Origin disabled.06:11
rwpI think it used to work on the Chimaera firefox but I no longer have a test case for it now.06:11
onefangOdd.06:11
onefangAh it's deb11u1 here, not deb12u1 like yours.06:12
onefangAfter my life settles my next major thing to do is upgrade everything to Daedalus.  But testing in VMs first.06:14
rwpIt's not significantly stressful for me to need to solve this, since the other version of firefox works okay.06:14
rwpIt's just as you say, odd, though so I wanted to mention it in passing at least.06:15
onefangMaybe there's an update in backports, or just downgrode to deb11u1.  Or that.06:15
rwpI am thinking it is something in the ESR build that is not quite right.06:15
rwpBut on the other hand it is perhaps equally likely that something on the reddit.com site is the problem and not quite right there.06:16
onefangI only use reddit if it pops up in searches and nothing else will help, coz I really hate web sites with excessive "click here to see more".  Reddit's is particularly annoying.06:16
rwpHTML used to be simple enough to be understood by mere mortals.  But now entire sites are constructed in Javascript manipulating the DOM and beyond human understanding.06:16
onefangAgreed.06:17
onefangAnd often for no need.06:17
XenguySometimes I just use a text browser these days, if I'm feeling exasperated with all the JS06:46
XenguySometimes it still works06:46
onefangI recently installed NoScript extension to Firefox-ESR for the same reason.06:49
XenguyYeah, having a toggle for JS is almost mandatory these days06:51
Jens3Xenguy: Which text browser do you use?07:00
rwpFor me I will sometimes be following referrals from friends or something and land on a paywalled site.  Then I will try with a text browser (emacs w3m for me) and often be able to read the otherwise paywalled article.07:00
fluffywolfI use yesscript...  it's simpler for just on/off js switching.07:29
fluffywolfbbl, bedtime07:29
fluffywolfonefang:  if you edit reddit urls to use old., it sucks less07:31
fluffywolfbbl07:31
golinuxDoes reddit ever not suck?07:44
DelTomixs/bug/feature/g :)07:45
XenguyJens3, Typically 'elinks'10:35
Guest3hi, is there a known problem or fix for the daedalus netinstall simply rebooting and returning to the same main option screen? I tried selecting Install, Expert Install, rescue mode, and regardless, my computer reboots and returns to this same screen of options.12:32
gnarfaceGuest3: that's odd. can you show me the link you downloaded it from?12:54
gnarfacei haven't seen anyone else complain about this yet12:56
Guest3gnarface, via https://www.devuan.org/get-devuan I went to https://devuan.krypto-it.pl/files.devuan.org/ and then https://devuan.krypto-it.pl/files.devuan.org/devuan_daedalus/installer-iso/ and got the file devuan_daedalus_5.0.1_amd64_netinstall.iso13:08
Guest3I did the gpg and sha checks13:08
gnarfaceGuest3: did you boot it from USB?13:09
Guest3yes13:09
gnarfacewhat command did you use to write it to the USB?13:09
Guest3i'd previously made a boot usb with the live desktop install to try it, and that worked13:09
Guest3i.e. i could boot up daedalus and use it ok from that earlier usb13:10
gnarfacejust show me the exact command you used so i can sanity check it13:10
gnarfacesome dd option combinations are better than others, and there's some bad advice floating around, you may merely have gotten (un)lucky13:11
Guest3ah ok, hang on a moment13:11
gnarfacealso, did you try expert mode in text mode instead of graphical mode (if that's still an option)13:12
Guest3dd if=devuan_daedalus_5.0.1_amd64_netinstall.iso of=/dev/sdb bs=1M status=progress oflag=sync13:12
gnarfaceyea, two sketchy choices here13:13
Guest3the installer came up in text mode, i saw no graphic option (unlike with the desktop iso)13:13
gnarfaceit might be under like, advanced options or other13:13
gnarfacei haven't seen this version yet but it's been buried before13:13
gnarface(maybe i'm remembering a debian release though, not 100% sure)13:13
Guest3i thought i read somewhere at devuan.org that there was no longer a graphic installer13:14
gnarfaceok, as for the dd command... omit "bs=1M" (not gonna help when writing to flash anyway) and use "conv=fsync" instead of "oflag=sync"13:14
gnarfacethat's probably not the issue, but try it to be sure13:14
Guest3ok, thanks, i will try that and see how it goes!13:14
Guest3i supposed the usb was written ok since it booted in the first place, but who knows. strange mysteries are possible. :)13:15
DelTomixshasum of his download source is good, just transferring a copy to double check myself here.13:17
onefangGuest3> I did the gpg and sha checks13:18
DelTomixyeah I know13:18
nethead23Hi, does anyone here as courier MTA with maildrop running on devuan 5?14:29
onefangnethead23: yes, yes, no.  I intend to upgrade all my boxes to Daedalus someday.  I use courier and maildrop though.  Why do you ask?14:42
nethead23onefang: I have one debian 11 box where "all" works including maildrop and spamassassin. I did migrate the courier setup to devuan 5 and there all seems to work but the maildrop invocation. Even with nearly identical config the devuan 5 installation gives a "Bad command line arguments, -h for help" and stops mail delivery.14:47
nethead23courierd confiuration is identical as is maildroprc on both machines14:48
nethead23What i did find out in the release notes is that debian 12 doesnt install the courier version of maildrop which seems required but i cant find it on the debian 11 versions which works either. Both installations only have maildrop installed under "/usr/bin" and not under one of the courier directories. Where they should be according to documentation.14:50
onefangYou said "nearly identical config", so what's different?14:54
nethead23domain setup during migration, locals, hosteddomains etc.15:00
onefangI would try to figure out what the actual command line is, then find out which one or more is the bad one.15:07
nethead23According to documentation and source code courier mta uses a custom version of maildrop. Which seems missing and according to debian 12 docs will be not installed anymore. Which doesnt make any sense. Increasing log verbosity and seeing the command line might help yes. Need to check where to actually do it. I just moved to courier 2 months ago after 26 years of using qmail :)15:10
onefangIt's late night on this side of the planet, but hopefully someone else can help out soon.15:26
nethead23About 21:30 here ...15:33
nethead23compiling courier from source also doesnt seem trivial.15:34
onefangI'm two hours ahead of you.15:36
nethead23Thats late, sweet dreams then...15:38
FatPhilwhat's the nearest debian version to chimaera?18:05
snorkcityFatPhil, do you mean this?  https://www.devuan.org/os/releases18:08
FatPhilBullseye gottit - cheers!18:31
FatPhilugh, trying to work through an installer script for something that officially only supports ubuntu, but kinda vaguely copes with debian too18:39
FatPhilI was wondering if I could modify it to recognise devuan as debian, and chimaera as bullseye18:39
FatPhilalas I don't have a program lsb_release, which it what it uses to work out what distro it's running18:40
FatPhilI have a bit of a headcold presently and am finding it very hard to think straigh at all.18:40
FatPhilaha, lsb-release != lsb_release!19:42
rwpFatPhil, Also try "cat /etc/os-release" too which is the source data for lsb stuff.21:31
rwpAFAICT the LSB is unfortunately now a dead effort.  It has fallen out of use and is completely ignored by the other distros.21:33
FatPhiloooh, didn't know about that21:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!